Research Square
PHASE-ED: Recorded Emergency Department Stay and Temporal Prediction Across Pandemic Phases at Jordanian Public Hospitals
By Abaddi S.
Abstract
Abstract Shorter recorded emergency department stays may reflect changes in care, patient composition or documentation. PHASE-ED characterised recorded stays across pandemic phases, examined recording-period sensitivity and assessed prediction using sparse variables in Jordanian Ministry of Health records. Following a facility and coverage audit of \(\:\text{2017\--2025}\) data, the primary retrospective series comprised \(\:\text{382,018}\) eligible encounters from \(\:\text{85,356}\) patients at one facility during \(\:\text{2018\--2025}\); seven other facility codes contributed separately bounded analyses. Median recorded length of stay was \(\:\text{63.0}\) minutes before COVID, \(\:\text{60.0}\) during COVID and \(\:\text{51.0}\) during recovery. Corresponding \(\:\text{90}\)th percentiles were \(\:\text{317.0}\), \(\:\text{294.0}\) and \(\:\text{156.6}\) minutes, and proportions exceeding six hours were \(\:\text{8.33\%}\), \(\:\text{7.73\%}\) and \(\:\text{1.22\%}\). Recovery medians were already lower before an observed timestamp-precision transition on \(\:\text{23}\) July \(\:\text{2024}\). Historical and recent benchmarks, quantile regression and boosted trees were developed chronologically and evaluated on \(\:\text{191,497}\) later encounters. Test mean absolute error was \(\:\text{49.25}\) minutes for the historical benchmark, \(\:\text{47.66}\) for regression and \(\:\text{48.02}\) for boosted trees; the development simplicity rule retained the historical benchmark. Its nominal \(\:\text{80\%}\) interval covered \(\:\text{91.5\%}\) overall but only \(\:\text{68.7\%}\) within the recorded Resuscitation category. Thus, shorter recovery intervals coexisted with modest predictive gains and uneven uncertainty coverage.



