The Analyst
Handling false negatives, false positives and reporting limits in analytical proficiency tests
Abstract
The Harmonised Protocol on proficiency testing produced by ISO, IUPAC and AOAC International recommends that participants' results on interval or ratio scales are converted to z-scores for assessment. When proficiency tests are conducted with materials that contain little or no analyte (simulating real conditions in residue analysis) scheme organisers have reported difficulty with applying the z-scoring system when false negatives and false positives occur. This paper concludes that the z-scoring system is adaptable without change to false negatives and positives, although a degree of statistical expertise is called for.
Source and rights
Published by The Analyst, 1997. The guideline itself is at the source linked here.
Prognia summarises this guideline for reference and education. It is not medical advice. Always check the official guideline and current local protocols before acting on it.
At a glance
- Published
- 1997
- Applies to
- 🌐 International
- Country of origin
- 🇬🇧 United Kingdom
- Scope
- International
- Journal
- The Analyst
- PubMed
- 9246820
- Added to Prognia
- 25 July 2026




