Developing an Individual Technical Preparedness Profile for a Highly Qualified Sprint Canoeist Using Biomechanical and Functional Indicators

Background. Technical preparedness in sprint canoeing depends on the coordinated interaction of the athlete, paddle, and boat. Isolated assessment of separate indicators may not reveal the specific factors limiting stroke effectiveness. An individual profile integrating biomechanical and functional data can identify these relationships and support decisions on technique, equipment, and seating configuration. Objectives. To develop an individual technical preparedness profile of a highly qualified canoeist and substantiate individualized directions for technique, equipment selection, seating calibration, and training. Materials and Methods. A single-case study involved an international-level canoeist; two additional canoeists provided reference data for selected indicators. Methods included surface electromyography, strain-gauge assessment of stroke parameters with Braca and Erbi paddles, kinematic analysis, 150-m speed testing in Nelo, Vajda, and Plastex boats, analysis of support interactions before and after seating calibration, and strength and functional assessments. The profile was developed through data processing, within-athlete comparison, consistency checking, classification into interpretative levels, and substantiation of coaching decisions. Results. The algorithm identified strengths in the stability of the paddle attack angle, speed performance in the Plastex and Vajda boats, and support stability after seating calibration. The main reserves concerned force transmission through the “leg–trunk–arm–paddle” chain, trunk stability during the final stroke phase, and shoulder-girdle speed-strength endurance. Compared with Braca, Erbi produced greater work per stroke (73.0 vs 49.3 J), a larger effective stroke portion (45.6 vs 25.8 J), and a higher proportion of effective work (62.3% vs 53.0%). Mean speed was 3.99 m·s⁻¹ in Plastex, 3.95 m·s⁻¹ in Vajda, and 3.80 m·s⁻¹ in Nelo. Seating calibration reduced center-of-pressure displacement in all support zones. No confirmed limiting factors were identified. Conclusions. Integrating biomechanical and functional indicators into an individual profile provides a scientifically grounded basis for personalizing technical preparation in sprint canoeing.