Evidence-based AGIHO guideline update on prophylaxis of infectious complications with granulocyte-stimulating factors (G-CSF) for the treatment of adult patients with cancer.
Published by Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) · ESCMID criteria
Summary
AI-generatedFebrile neutropenia (FN) is an important complication of cancer treatment. This updated evidence-based guideline provides recommendations for the prophylactic use of G-CSF to reduce the risk of FN in adult cancer patients, addressing changes in antineoplastic treatments such as immunotherapy over the past decade.
Key Takeaways
- 1Hodgkin lymphoma: BrECADD or BV+AVD are new standard immunochemotherapy protocols and should be complemented with G-CSF.
- 2AML: G-CSF is safe in the treatment of AML and should be considered regarding the shortening of neutropenia and duration of hospitalization.
- 3Treatment with T cell engager products: G-CSF administration in neutropenia after CAR T cell therapy and bispecific antibody treatment is safe.
- 4Biosimilar G-CSF is at least non-inferior compared to originator G-CSF in terms of efficacy and survival and is a cost-effective alternative.
- 5Efbemalenograstim alfa is at least non-inferior compared to pegfilgrastim or filgrastim in terms of efficacy.
- 6G-CSF for primary prophylaxis can help to save antibiotics.
What's New in This Version
Updated the 2014 AGIHO guideline to provide a comprehensive analysis of literature since 2014, including new recommendations on the use of G-CSF in immunotherapy settings (CAR T cells and bispecific antibodies), new immunochemotherapy protocols (BrECADD, BV+AVD), and the use of biosimilars and efbemalenograstim alfa.
Key Recommendations
6. G-CSF in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma
- rec-1
It is recommended to administer G-CSF on days 2–4 after completing cytotoxic treatment rather than on the same day as chemotherapy to avoid an increase in febrile neutropenia.
BEvidence: IIprophylaxis
7. G-CSF in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma
- rec-2
Primary G-CSF prophylaxis is not routinely recommended in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma undergoing ABVD 1st line treatment but might be a clinically valid supportive option in selected patients with advanced age or relevant comorbidities.
CEvidence: IIuprophylaxis - rec-3
Primary G-CSF prophylaxis is recommended for both younger and elderly patients receiving BV+AVD as first-line treatment for advanced (stage III/IV) HL.
AEvidence: IIuprophylaxis - rec-4
Prophylactic G-CSF should be given in all patients with HL undergoing escalated BEACOPP or BrECADD therapy.
AEvidence: IIuprophylaxis
8. G-CSF in the treatment of acute leukemia
- rec-5
G-CSF shows effects on the reduction of neutropenia and a benefit regarding infections for patients undergoing medium-intensity consolidation with high-dose cytarabine (≥60 years) and should be considered to shorten hospitalization.
BEvidence: IIuprophylaxis
9. Secondary application of G-CSF
- rec-6
Secondary application of G-CSF is recommended after a neutropenic complication in the previous cycle has occurred.
BEvidence: IIIsecondary prophylaxis
10. G-CSF after CAR T cell therapy
- rec-7
We recommend the use of G-CSF in neutropenia after CAR-T cell treatment.
BEvidence: IIItherapeutic
11. G-CSF after treatment with bispecific antibodies (BsAb)
- rec-8
G-CSF should not be administered during step-up dosing or during cytokine release syndrome (CRS).
BEvidence: IIIcontraindication
12. Biosimilar G-CSF and efbemalenograstim alfa
- rec-9
Using biosimilar G-CSF for prophylaxis of infections in patients with cancer is recommended as it is cost-effective and at least non-inferior to originator G-CSF.
AEvidence: Iprophylaxis
13. G-CSF as part of antibiotic stewardship programs
- rec-10
G-CSF should be preferred over antibiotics whenever reasonable for primary prophylaxis of FN/infections due to putative long term detrimental effects of antibiotics.
AEvidence: Iprophylaxis
Scope & Objectives
Clinical Topic
Prophylaxis of infectious complications with G-CSF
Objectives
To provide evidence-based information for day-by-day clinical decision making in the care of adult patients with hematological and solid malignancies.
Target Patient Population
Adult patients with cancer
Target Providers
Patient Criteria & Setting
Therapeutic Area
OncologyGuideline Scope
Special Populations
Evidence Grading
System: ESCMID criteria
Evidence Levels
Recommendation Strength
Safety & Contraindications
Contraindications
- During step-up dosing of bispecific antibodies
- During cytokine release syndrome (CRS)
Authors & Contributors
Guideline Features
Learning Context
Difficulty
advanced
Learning Paths