Abstract / Summary
Anaemia is among the most prevalent comorbidities in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but pooled prognostic estimates predate the contemporary left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% definition and combine legacy with contemporary cohorts. We quantified the association between World Health Organization (WHO)-defined anaemia and all-cause mortality in HFpEF and tested whether it persists under the stricter ejection-fraction threshold. Following PRISMA 2020 (PROSPERO CRD420251361160), we searched five databases from inception to 2026 and included cohort studies reporting an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for binary WHO-defined anaemia vs all-cause mortality in an ejection fraction-stratified HFpEF population; every estimate was verified against its primary source and screening was duplicated (κ = 1.00 after adjudication). Of 6123 records, 20 studies were included; 17 (109 909 patients; anaemia prevalence 26%-70%; follow-up 12-72 months) contributed to two pre-specified co-primary pools analysed with Paule-Mandel random-effects models and Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman variance correction: a legacy pool (LVEF ≥40%, k = 17) and a contemporary pool (LVEF ≥50%, k = 12). Anaemia was associated with higher all-cause mortality in both: aHR 1.49 (95% CI 1.35-1.66; 95% prediction interval (PI) 1.07-2.09; I2 = 85%) in the ≥40% pool and 1.41 (1.26-1.57; PI 1.06-1.87; I2 = 83%) in the ≥50% pool, both PIs excluding the null. The estimate was stable across 12 pre-specified sensitivity analyses (range 1.45-1.52) with no influential study. Across four Bayesian priors, the posterior median aHR was 1.39-1.49 with posterior probability of harm ≥.999, and a robust Bayesian model-average that entertains null, homogeneity, and publication-bias models returned aHR 1.41 (95% credible interval 1.17-1.58). Although small-study effects were detected (Egger P = .03), the bias-corrected estimate was essentially unchanged (PEESE aHR 1.39). A per-1 g/dL lower-haemoglobin dose-response meta-analysis (k = 6) yielded aHR 1.17 (1.08-1.27). The accrued sample exceeded the diversity-adjusted required information size, and GRADE certainty was moderate under the prognostic-factor framework. WHO-defined anaemia is independently associated with a ∼40-50% higher all-cause mortality in HFpEF, preserved under the contemporary LVEF ≥50% definition and robust to extensive sensitivity, Bayesian, and bias-correction analyses. These findings support incorporating anaemia into HFpEF risk assessment and motivate mortality-powered trials in rigorously defined HFpEF, while not implying that anaemia correction improves outcomes. PROSPERO CRD420251361160.
Topics
Primary Source
ESC heart failure
Ask Prognia AI
Have questions about this meta-analysis?
Prognia AI can search this source alongside 35M+ PubMed papers and current ESC, AHA, NICE, and ADA guidelines to give you a fully cited clinical answer.
Related Clinical Guidelines
Related Blog Posts
ESC 2023 Heart Failure Guidelines: What Every Cardiologist Needs to Know
The 2023 focused update to the ESC Heart Failure Guidelines introduced key changes to SGLT2 inhibitor recommendations, HFmrEF management, and device therapy thresholds. Here is a practical summary.
CHADS₂-VASc in Practice: When to Start Anticoagulation in AF
A practical walkthrough of the CHADS₂-VASc scoring system, its ESC guideline thresholds, and how to use it alongside HAS-BLED to counsel patients with atrial fibrillation.