Abstract / Summary
Conventional screening modalities for atrial fibrillation (AF) are often constrained by considerable resource and logistical demands. The randomized controlled NORwegian atrial fibrillation self-SCREENing (NORSCREEN) trial employs a fully digital approach to recruitment and implementation. The aim of this pre-specified analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of the fully digital recruitment and screening strategy, determine the prevalence of screen-detected AF, and assess initial adherence to therapeutic recommendations. Individuals aged ≥65 years with ≥1 additional risk factor for stroke were digitally recruited from the general Norwegian population and randomized 1:1 to screening or usual care. Exclusion criteria included prior AF, anticoagulation, implantable cardiac electronic devices, or lack of smartphone access. Participants allocated to screening were mailed a patch-based electrocardiogram sensor for site-less continuous monitoring over 7 days. Those with diagnosed AF were advised to contact their general practitioner to initiate appropriate therapy. A total of 551 555 Norwegian residents were digitally invited; of these, 139 596 (25.3%) completed the digital eligibility assessment, 74 956 (53.7%) were eligible, and 50 549 (67.4%) were randomized to screening or usual care. The median age was 75 years (inter-quartile range: 69-78), 23 445 (46.4%) were female, and the mean CHA2DS2-VA risk score was 2.6 ± 0.9. In the screening group, 19 723 (78.1%) completed the study procedures. Previously undiagnosed AF was identified in 382 (1.9%) screened participants, of whom 366 (95.8%) initiated anticoagulation therapy. The NORSCREEN trial demonstrates that fully digital, large-scale, site-less AF screening is feasible and effective in an at-risk population, identifying previously undiagnosed AF in 1.9% of screened individuals and showing high adherence to therapeutic recommendations. NCT05914883.
Topics
Primary Source
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
Ask Prognia AI
Have questions about this randomised trial?
Prognia AI can search this source alongside 35M+ PubMed papers and current ESC, AHA, NICE, and ADA guidelines to give you a fully cited clinical answer.
Related Clinical Guidelines
Related Blog Posts
ESC 2023 Heart Failure Guidelines: What Every Cardiologist Needs to Know
The 2023 focused update to the ESC Heart Failure Guidelines introduced key changes to SGLT2 inhibitor recommendations, HFmrEF management, and device therapy thresholds. Here is a practical summary.
CHADS₂-VASc in Practice: When to Start Anticoagulation in AF
A practical walkthrough of the CHADS₂-VASc scoring system, its ESC guideline thresholds, and how to use it alongside HAS-BLED to counsel patients with atrial fibrillation.