ProgniaPrognia
Back to Articles
OncologyMeta-analysis

ctDNA-guided or ctDNA-stratified adjuvant immunotherapy compared with observation or placebo after radical surgery for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis.

28 August 2026·2 min read·World journal of urology

Abstract / Summary

Adjuvant immunotherapy after radical surgery for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma has produced heterogeneous trial-level results, partly because clinicopathological risk factors do not completely identify patients with molecular residual disease (MRD). Circulating tumor DNA may refine postoperative treatment selection by distinguishing patients who are most likely to benefit from immune checkpoint inhibition from those who may experience unnecessary toxicity. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the for Systematic Reviews and Preferred Reporting Items Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched from their inception until May 2026. Prospective comparative studies evaluating ctDNA-guided or ctDNA-stratified adjuvant immunotherapy versus observation or placebo after radical surgery for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma were included. Hazard ratios were pooled for time-to-event outcomes using generic inverse variance models, and risk ratios were pooled for dichotomous safety outcomes using Mantel-Haenszel random-effects models. The risk of bias was assessed using ROB2, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Five reports representing three independent randomized trial datasets were included. The ctDNA-defined efficacy population included 310 patients receiving adjuvant immunotherapy and 208 receiving observation or placebo, whereas the pooled safety analysis included 632 and 529 patients, respectively. ctDNA-guided or ctDNA-stratified adjuvant immunotherapy significantly improved disease-free survival (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.32-0.66; P < 0.0001; I²=38%) and overall survival (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.72; P < 0.00001; I²=0%). Any-grade adverse events were not significantly increased (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98-1.12), nor were grade ≥ 3/3-4 adverse events (RR 1.44, 95% CI 0.98-2.11) or serious adverse events (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.87-1.80). ctDNA-guided or ctDNA-stratified adjuvant immunotherapy after radical surgery was associated with improved disease-free and overall survival without a statistically significant pooled increase in major toxicities. ctDNA is a promising tool for residual molecular disease that may inform postoperative immunotherapy selection; however, current evidence remains insufficient to establish ctDNA-guided selection as a definitive standard of care. Implementation should remain linked to validated assay platforms, patient fitness assessment, and individualized shared decision-making. Not applicable. This study was not a clinical trial.

Topics

HumansCarcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsImmunotherapyChemotherapy, AdjuvantAdjuvant immunotherapyAtezolizumabGRADE.Meta-analysisMolecular residual disease

Primary Source

World journal of urology

View Source

Ask Prognia AI

Have questions about this meta-analysis?

Prognia AI can search this source alongside 35M+ PubMed papers and current ESC, AHA, NICE, and ADA guidelines to give you a fully cited clinical answer.

Related Clinical Guidelines