Cureus
Post-acne Erythema: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Interventions Across Clinical, Instrumental, and Patient-Reported Outcomes
By Ahmed Alhussain, Mohammad Majrashi, Khalid Omar AlMubarak and 11 others.
Abstract
Post-acne erythema (PAE) is a persistent acne sequela without an established standard treatment.This systematic review evaluated the comparative efficacy and safety of interventions tested in randomized trials.PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception through August 1, 2026.Randomized parallel-group and split-face trials reporting erythema outcomes were eligible.Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool.Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis, and available findings were synthesized narratively.Nine trials involving 301 participants contributed 11 pairwise comparisons.Against untreated or blank controls, favorable effects were reported for picosecond alexandrite laser, narrow-spectrum vascular intense pulsed light (IPL), and non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid mesotherapy.A 577-nm semiconductor laser showed interim instrumental benefit, but blinded assessors found no final between-side difference.In active-treatment and add-on comparisons, narrow-spectrum IPL was favored over broad-spectrum IPL, neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd) laser added to lowdose isotretinoin was favored over isotretinoin alone, and 577-nm pro-yellow laser was favored over topical brimonidine.Botulinum toxin type A was favored over broadband light at the earliest assessment only.Fractional laser and pulsed dye laser did not differ significantly, while delicate pulsed light and Q-switched 1064-nm Nd laser showed no sustained difference at the final assessment.Adverse events were mild and transient, although pigmentation and blistering occurred with one broad-spectrum IPL protocol.Five trials had some concerns, and four had high overall risk of bias.Trials suggested potential benefits, but small samples, heterogeneity, short follow-up, and reporting limitations precluded identification of a preferred treatment.Larger, prospectively registered trials using blinded assessment and standardized outcomes are needed.



