Abstract / Summary
The aim of this study was to determine whether the frequency of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and the severity profile of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) differ across body mass index (BMI) categories. A retrospective analysis was performed using 400 inpatient medical records from 2023-2024 with verified ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease and sufficient information on anthropometry, hepatic status, and intestinal disease activity. The cohort comprised 118 patients with normal BMI, 176 with overweight, and 106 with obesity. MASLD status was reconstructed from routine clinical documentation and required hepatic steatosis in the appropriate cardiometabolic context. Ultrasonography was the principal source of evidence for steatosis; laboratory findings, non-invasive indices, and elastography were considered supportive when available. Ulcerative colitis activity was assessed with the Mayo Score and Crohn's disease activity with the Crohn's Disease Activity Index; disease-specific results were harmonized into mild, moderate, and severe categories for pooled comparisons. MASLD was identified in 181 of 400 patients (45.3%). Its frequency increased from 20.3% in the normal-BMI group to 49.4% in the overweight group and 66.0% in the obesity group (chi2=49.29; p<0.001). The largest absolute increase, 29.1 percentage points, occurred between normal BMI and overweight. The proportion of severe IBD rose in the same order, from 6.8% to 14.8% and 32.1% across the three BMI strata (chi2=39.45; p<0.001). In unadjusted pairwise comparisons, the odds of MASLD were higher with overweight than with normal BMI (OR=3.83; 95% CI 2.24-6.55) and higher with obesity than with normal BMI (OR=7.62; 95% CI 4.17-13.91); obesity also differed from overweight (OR=1.99; 95% CI 1.21-3.28). These findings demonstrate an ordered BMI-related pattern in which MASLD becomes more frequent and severe IBD represents a larger share of cases. However, MASLD was still documented in approximately one fifth of patients with normal BMI, indicating that BMI is useful for clinical prioritization but not for excluding steatotic liver disease. Because the study was retrospective, liver assessment reflected routine care, and the effect estimates were not adjusted for treatment exposure, disease duration, or other metabolic covariates, the observed relationships should be interpreted as associations rather than causal effects.