Abstract / Summary
Cervical excision increases the risk of preterm birth, while active surveillance for grade 2 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia offers no active treatment. Topical therapy for human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated lower genital tract disease could address this gap, yet no agent is approved for intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix, vagina, or vulva, and a 2026 systematic review left open whether cervical treatment reduces progression. Scarcity does not explain this: 52 randomized trials have evaluated adjuvant treatment after excision, but heterogeneity in phenotype, comparator, and endpoint, and incomplete access to primary reports limit their interpretability. Three problems recur. First, the target epithelial population differs by phenotype and mechanism, yet local exposure was seldom characterized, although measurement strategies are set out here. Second, some antiviral claims rely on systems that do not reproduce the differentiation-dependent HPV life cycle. Third, endpoints are read against spontaneous regression approaching the effect sought. Randomized evidence supports imiquimod as a non-surgical option for appropriately selected women with vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; cervical conclusions depend on comparator and endpoint. We propose a conceptual eight-element sequence from clinical intention to inference, an interpretive aid, and not a validated appraisal instrument. Future studies should prespecify these elements and characterize exposure where feasible.