Abstract / Summary
BackgroundAs demand for specialised veterinary care increases, referrals between first opinion practices and specialty clinics are becoming an increasingly important part of the chain of care. However, care pathways between these two settings can involve multiple transitions back and forth, each representing a potential opportunity for error or information loss. Issues such as communication failures, lack of information transfer, and delayed discharge letters back to the first opinion practice may occur, potentially compromising continuity and quality of care. Characterising veterinary surgeons’ satisfaction with this process is therefore an important first step towards identifying where these risks arise and how they might be addressed.ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the status quo of the referral process and veterinary surgeons’ satisfaction with it in the German-speaking DACH region (Germany, Austria, Switzerland), in order to identify communication and information gaps along the referral pathway and inform recommendations for improving collaboration between first opinion practices and specialty clinics.MethodsAn online questionnaire was distributed among small animal vets in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Data from 657 general practitioners (GPs) and specialists (SPs) were analysed.ResultsThe majority of veterinary surgeons were generally satisfied with collaboration within the referral process; however, GPs rated cooperation more favourably than SPs. A clear lack of information within referral letters was identified, including medical history, medication details, clients’ contact details, and specific clinical questions. Participants considered good communication, professional skills, and timely discharge referral letters to be the three most important aspects of collaboration. According to GPs, discharge letters were received in 90% of cases, while according to SPs, discharge letters were sent in 80% of cases. The most common problems identified were delayed discharge referral letters (56%), communication failures (55.7%), and missing information (49.5%).ConclusionAlthough participants expressed overall satisfaction with collaboration in the chain of care, problems arise at several points along the referral pathway in the DACH region. We recommend the development of unified referral guidelines within good clinical practice schemes, ideally regulated by relevant authorities, specifically addressing information exchange within referral letters.