Abstract / Summary
Abstract Background Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) improves short-term outcomes in elective colectomy, however, the choice of surgical approach in hemodynamically stable patients with obstructing right-sided colon cancer remains unclear in emergency settings. MIS could be considered and the present study aims to evaluate short-term outcomes of MIS in bowel obstructed patients compared with open surgery (OPEN). Methods A retrospective nationwide study including patients from the nationwide Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry (SCRCR) undergoing emergency right-sided colectomy in Sweden (2017–2023) was conducted. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed based on sex, age, ASA class, hospital size, and operative timing (on-call vs. daytime). Outcomes included length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and surgical quality indicators. Analysis was performed according to intention-to-treat. Results A total of 1147 patients were identified. Of the 1,147 included patients, 99 (8.6%) underwent an initially minimally invasive approach. After matching, 99 patients remained in each group. The conversion rate was 34%. Median LOS was 9 days (IQR 6;14) after OPEN and 6 days (IQR 5;10) after MIS. In quantile regression with bootstrap standard errors, MIS was associated with a 3-day shorter median LOS (median difference − 3.0 days, 95% CI − 4 to − 2, p = 0.002). Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 2) occurred in 38.8% after OPEN and in 23.2% after MIS. Logistic regression analysis with robust standard errors showed significantly lower odds of postoperative complications after MIS (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27–0.83, p = 0.009). No significant differences were observed in re-admission, 90-day mortality, R0 resection, lymph node yield, blood loss or operative time. Conclusion In this nationwide observational cohort, an initially minimally invasive approach was associated with shorter length of stay and fewer postoperative complications. No statistically significant differences were observed in the available short-term surgical and pathological quality indicators. Given the limited number of MIS procedures and potential for residual confounding, these findings support further evaluation of MIS in carefully selected patients.