BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Maternal hematological and coagulation measurements and neonatal outcomes in placental abruption: a two-center retrospective cohort study
By Qiqi Cao, Xun Tan, Jiayi Zhang and 5 others.
Abstract
Abstract Background Placental abruption can compromise neonatal condition, but the relevance of routinely available maternal hematological and coagulation measurements remains uncertain. We evaluated these associations using ordinal and sparse-event methods. Methods We retrospectively analyzed records from two centers (January 2020 to January 2026). All 135 records met clinical eligibility criteria; the fixed complete-data cohort included 124 pregnancies and 122 live births after two intrauterine fetal deaths were excluded from neonatal analyses. Model-specific sensitivity analyses included up to 129 live births. Suzhou data extraction and related analyses began after ethics approval and waiver on 8 June 2026. Primary proportional-odds models adjusted for maternal age, recorded body mass index (BMI), gestational age, diabetes, hypertensive disorders, and center. Measurement-expanded, Firth, bootstrap, D-dimer, and birth-weight analyses were exploratory, with false-discovery-rate correction where specified. Results Among 122 live births, 15 (12.3%) and five (4.1%) had 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores < 7. Sampling times were unavailable for Nantong. In Suzhou, selected complete blood count (CBC) and coagulation panels were obtained a median of 32.5 and 34.6 days before delivery, and only 10 and 8 were within 14 days. Gestational age was associated with higher 1- and 5-minute scores (odds ratio (OR) per standard deviation (SD), 2.17 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.46 to 3.21] and 2.59 [95% CI: 1.60 to 4.20]) and was bootstrap-stable. Measurement blocks did not improve gestational-age-adjusted ordinal or birth-weight models, and no individual measurement remained significant after multiplicity correction. The n = 129 clinical sensitivity analysis confirmed the gestational-age associations. Without gestational-age adjustment, the hematology block improved the 5-minute model, but nominal hemoglobin (Hb) and raw-scale D-dimer findings did not survive correction; the D-dimer association disappeared after log transformation. Conclusions Gestational age was the most stable correlate of Apgar scores. No individual maternal measurement showed a robust association after multiplicity correction. Because sampling times were heterogeneous or unavailable, these measurements cannot be interpreted as acute-abruption biomarkers. Prospective studies require standardized sampling and harmonized assays.





