Journal of the Heart Valve Society
Premeasured Neochordal Replacement for Mitral Valve Regurgitation Is Comparable to Leaflet Resection
By Sammy Y. Gao, Matthew Ambrosio and Vigneshwar Kasirajan.
Abstract
Objective Neochordal replacement is a preferred technique for mitral valve repair. We describe a method for neochordal replacement utilizing premeasured neochords and compare outcomes to traditional leaflet resection. Methods This is a single institution retrospective review of all patients who underwent mitral valve repair from February 2008 to April 2024. Patients underwent leaflet resection or neochordal replacement using premeasured neochordae constructed with a chain of square knots based on preoperative echocardiography. The primary outcome was recurrence of moderate to severe mitral regurgitation. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and reoperation. Statistical analyses included propensity score matching and multivariate analyses were performed to control for baseline differences. Results Among 201 patients (neochordal replacement: 154; leaflet resection: 47), median follow-up time was 4.29 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in recurrence of moderate to severe mitral regurgitation (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.25-2.69; P = .9), reoperation (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.232-3.576; P = .7), or mortality (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.09-1.88; P = .3). At 5 years, freedom from mitral regurgitation was 84.5% for neochordal replacement and 85.5% for leaflet resection. Multivariate analysis did not identify surgical technique as a significant predictor of recurrence of mitral regurgitation ( P = .86). Conclusions This mitral valve repair technique yields comparable outcomes to leaflet resection and is amenable to minimally invasive approaches.






