Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
Technical issues: logistics. AAMC.
Inhoud in het Engels
Abstract
The author states that she became interested in standardized patients (SPs) around 20 years ago as a means of developing a more uniform and effective way to provide instruction and evaluation of basic clinical skills. She reflects upon in detail: (1) the logistics of using SPs in teaching; (2) how SPs are used in assessment; (3) what aspects of performance SPs can be trained to record and evaluate; (4) issues concerning checklists; (5) evaluation of interviewing skills; (6) evaluation of written communication skills; (7) importance of defining what is being tested; (8) various kinds and uses of inter-station exercises and problems of scoring them; (9) case development and the various sources for case material; (10) ways to generate scores; (11) selecting and training SPs; (12) role of the faculty and primary importance of bedside training with real patients; and (13) pros and cons of national versus single-school efforts to use SPs. She concludes by cautioning that further research must be done before SPs can be used for high-stakes certifying and licensing examinations.
Bron en rechten
Gepubliceerd door Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 1993. De richtlijn zelf staat bij de bron die hier is gelinkt.
Prognia vat deze richtlijn samen als naslag en voor onderwijs. Dit is geen medisch advies. Controleer altijd de officiële richtlijn en de geldende lokale protocollen voordat je ernaar handelt.
In het kort
- Gepubliceerd
- 1993
- Geldt voor
- 🇺🇸 Verenigde Staten
- Reikwijdte
- Nationaal




