Je pagina wordt geladen…
Patient Preference and Adherence
Door Justyna Chojdak-Łukasiewicz, Aleksandra Kołtuniuk, Gianluca Pucciarelli en 2 anderen.
Inhoud in het Engels
Ward zet deze artikelen in dezelfde app als je kaarten en vragen. Eén gratis account voor Ward, Suture, Osler en Prognia.
Adherence to disease modifying therapies (DMTs) is essential for treatment outcomes in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Non-adherence has been associated with an increased risk of relapses, disease progression and higher healthcare costs; therefore, it is essential to identify factors associated with adherence.
The aim of the study was to evaluate self-reported adherence to therapeutic recommendation among patients with RRMS and to examine its associations with treatment satisfaction and physician-patient communication. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional online survey study included 165 patients with RRMS (67.27% women), with mean age 44.42 ± 10.43 years, treated at the Department of Neurology, Wroclaw Medical University. Adherence was assessed using the Adherence in Chronic Diseases Scale (ACDS), physician-patient communication with the 14-item Polish version of the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT), and treatment satisfaction with the SATMED-Q questionnaire. Associations with the ACDS score were examined by univariable linear regression and by a multivariable model specified a priori on conceptual and clinical grounds (CAT, SATMED-Q, age, sex, EDSS, comorbidities, place of residence, route of administration and disease duration), supported by regression diagnostics and by ordinal and robust-regression sensitivity analyses.
The mean ACDS score was 25.49 ± 2.51 (range 14– 28). Applying the established cut-offs, 8 participants (4.8%) were classified as showing low, 80 (48.5%) intermediate and 77 (46.7%) high adherence. Patients reported high satisfaction with physician communication (mean CAT score: 61.61 ± 9.73) and with treatment (mean total SATMED-Q score 78.67 ± 15.91). In the a-priori multivariable model (n = 165; R 2 = 0.226, adjusted R 2 = 0.171, overall F p < 0.001), higher CAT scores (adjusted β = 0.058 per point, 95% CI 0.019 to 0.098, p = 0.004) and higher total SATMED-Q scores (adjusted β = 0.031, 95% CI 0.005 to 0.057, p = 0.018) were associated with higher self-reported adherence, whereas a higher EDSS score was associated with lower adherence (adjusted β = − 0.552, 95% CI − 0.857 to − 0.247, p < 0.001). All three associations were of modest magnitude and were confirmed in ordinal and robust-regression sensitivity analyses (overall F(11,153) = 4.07, p < 0.001).
In this single-centre cross-sectional sample of patients with RRMS, higher self-reported treatment satisfaction and more favourable ratings of physician-patient communication were associated with modestly higher self-reported adherence scores, while greater disability was associated with lower adherence. Longitudinal and intervention studies are required to establish directionality and to determine whether communication-focused or shared decision-making interventions can improve adherence to disease-modifying therapies. Keywords: multiple sclerosis, adherence, treatment satisfaction, physician-patient communication, cross-sectional studies
Gepubliceerd in Patient Preference and Adherence. Het abstract staat hier zoals het is gepubliceerd en blijft het werk van de auteurs; lees het volledige artikel bij de bron.
Prognia toont dit artikel als naslag en voor onderwijs. Het is geen medisch advies. Lees altijd het origineel en volg de actuele richtlijnen en lokale protocollen voordat je ernaar handelt.
