Abstract / Summary
Background and Objectives: Breast cancer remains one of the most common malignancies worldwide, and early detection plays a crucial role in improving treatment outcomes and reducing mortality. Several experimental studies using animal models of breast cancer have explored the potential of terahertz-based technologies in this field. However, their preclinical evidence base in breast cancer remains heterogeneous and has not been systematically synthesized with a focus on experimental models, imaging protocols, and barriers to translation. Methods: We conducted a descriptive systematic review, according to PRISMA guidelines, of 10 articles selected from a total of 372 identified across four databases-PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane-regarding the diagnostic performance of terahertz (THz) imaging in breast cancer animal models. We included studies that used rodent models diagnosed with breast cancer, subsequently confirmed through histological examination, and extracted relevant data. Results: The results were synthesized using a narrative approach. Most studies used C57BL/6J mice with E0771 cell line-induced breast tumors, with histopathology as the reference standard. In the reflection mode, at frequencies between 0.1 and 4 THz, the identification of tumoral, fibrous, fat, and muscle tissues was possible. Conclusions: Overall, the available preclinical evidence supports THz imaging as a promising proof-of-concept approach for breast tissue characterization, but not yet as a standardized or clinically translatable diagnostic platform. Future studies should use harmonized animal models, standardized acquisition and specimen-handling protocols, transparent reporting of classification workflows, and consistent outcome metrics to enable comparison across studies and to clarify the biological and biophysical determinants of THz contrast in breast cancer.
Primary Source
Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
Ask Prognia AI
Have questions about this review article?
Prognia AI can search this source alongside 35M+ PubMed papers and current ESC, AHA, NICE, and ADA guidelines to give you a fully cited clinical answer.