Abstract / Summary
The therapeutic landscape of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has expanded beyond sorafenib, with multiple combination regimens now demonstrating improved outcomes. However, the absence of direct head-to-head comparisons complicates treatment selection in clinical practice. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis of phase III randomized controlled trials to compare the efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for patients with advanced HCC. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥ 3 adverse events were assessed. Treatment rankings were estimated using surface under the cumulative ranking curve values. Sixteen trials comprising 8, 753 patients were included. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC)-based regimens, particularly sorafenib plus HAIC and HAIC_FO, achieved the highest rankings for both PFS and OS. Several immunotherapy-based combinations also demonstrated significant survival benefits across multiple clinical subgroups without a corresponding increase in severe adverse events. Subgroup analyses suggested consistent benefits of selected regimens across age, sex, macrovascular invasion, extrahepatic spread, and ECOG performance status. HAIC-based strategies and selected immunotherapy combinations appear to provide superior survival outcomes as first-line treatment for advanced HCC. Given limitations related to comparator selection and evolving evidence, future head-to-head randomized trials and updated network analyses are warranted to refine optimal treatment strategies. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251124082.
Primary Source
Frontiers in immunology
Ask Prognia AI
Have questions about this meta-analysis?
Prognia AI can search this source alongside 35M+ PubMed papers and current ESC, AHA, NICE, and ADA guidelines to give you a fully cited clinical answer.