Abstract / Summary
Most studies assessing digital interventions for people with heart failure (HF) focus on clinical outcomes, and few include patient perspectives. Understanding patient experiences of the use of a digital HF platform along with community health worker (CHW) care as part of a digitally enabled CHW intervention can inform management of HF at home and improve the postdischarge phase of care. This study aimed to identify patient perceptions related to the use of a digitally enabled CHW intervention. This qualitative study included interviews with adults (aged ≥18 years) with HF who were assigned to the intervention arm of a pilot randomized controlled trial from September 2022 to June 2023. For 30 days after hospital discharge, intervention participants were paired with a CHW and instructed to use a digital platform that tracked biometrics (eg, heart rate, oxygenation, blood pressure, body weight, steps taken, and symptoms) and offered educational videos. In-depth interviews were conducted after the 30-day intervention was complete (between 31 and 45 days after hospital discharge). Key interview domains included barriers and facilitators to the intervention, use of remote monitoring in HF, and the role of CHWs in HF home care. Interviews with participants (N=19; mean age 62.1, SD 15.1 years) yielded five key themes: (1) the combined intervention was well received, and CHWs made the use of the digital platform more approachable; (2) the digital platform enhanced HF knowledge and confidence in self-care; (3) digital platform use was easy to integrate into daily routines; (4) in addition to assisting with navigation of unmet social needs (eg, transportation, insurance benefits, and food access), CHWs provided emotional support and increased motivation for clinical care plan adherence and platform use; and (5) connectivity issues and other technical challenges occurred with digital platform use. The digital platform was easily integrated into patients' daily routines. CHWs played a key role in making the platform more approachable for participant use. Further research is needed to better understand the impact of this intervention in larger HF populations over more extended time intervals.
Primary Source
JMIR cardio
Ask Prognia AI
Have questions about this randomised trial?
Prognia AI can search this source alongside 35M+ PubMed papers and current ESC, AHA, NICE, and ADA guidelines to give you a fully cited clinical answer.
Related Clinical Guidelines
Related Blog Posts
ESC 2023 Heart Failure Guidelines: What Every Cardiologist Needs to Know
The 2023 focused update to the ESC Heart Failure Guidelines introduced key changes to SGLT2 inhibitor recommendations, HFmrEF management, and device therapy thresholds. Here is a practical summary.
CHADS₂-VASc in Practice: When to Start Anticoagulation in AF
A practical walkthrough of the CHADS₂-VASc scoring system, its ESC guideline thresholds, and how to use it alongside HAS-BLED to counsel patients with atrial fibrillation.