Abstract / Summary
The incidence of cardiovascular diseases, particularly heart failure, has been rising year by year. Traditional Chinese medicines containing Astragalus have been widely used in clinical research. However, there is no definitive research on the efficacy of proprietary Chinese medicines containing Astragalus. A network meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of oral traditional Chinese medicines containing Astragalus for the treatment of heart failure. This study searched 6 databases for clinical randomized controlled trials involving the use of traditional Chinese herbal medicines containing Astragalus alone or in combination with other drugs, with a search period from the establishment of the databases to May 27, 2025. Using the Cochrane Quality Assessment Manual, we conducted a bias analysis of the included studies, and the extracted data were analyzed using network meta-analysis in Stata 18. A total of 18 studies were included, involving 1584 patients with heart failure, with 16 types of traditional Chinese medicines containing Astragalus. The network meta-analysis via Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve analysis indicated that: Compared to using Western medicine (WM) alone, Astragalus Granule + WM ranked best for improving overall clinical efficacy rate; Qiangxin Capsule + WM was optimal for improving six-minute walk test; Astragalus Granule + WM showed the best efficacy for reducing B-type natriuretic peptide levels; Yanxing Decoction + WM ranked first for lowering N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels; Xinlishen Compound + WM was the optimal combination for improving left ventricular ejection fraction; Qili Qiangxin Capsule + WM performed best for reducing left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; Yangxin Tongmai II Prescription + WM exhibited the highest efficacy for decreasing Minnesota Heart Failure Quality of Life Questionnaire scores. Adding oral traditional Chinese medicine containing Astragalus to WM treatment can further improve the clinical efficacy of heart failure. However, due to the limited number and quality of the included studies in this research, the above conclusions still require further validation through well-designed randomized double-blind controlled trials.
Primary Source
Medicine
Ask Prognia AI
Have questions about this meta-analysis?
Prognia AI can search this source alongside 35M+ PubMed papers and current ESC, AHA, NICE, and ADA guidelines to give you a fully cited clinical answer.
Related Clinical Guidelines
Related Blog Posts
ESC 2023 Heart Failure Guidelines: What Every Cardiologist Needs to Know
The 2023 focused update to the ESC Heart Failure Guidelines introduced key changes to SGLT2 inhibitor recommendations, HFmrEF management, and device therapy thresholds. Here is a practical summary.
CHADS₂-VASc in Practice: When to Start Anticoagulation in AF
A practical walkthrough of the CHADS₂-VASc scoring system, its ESC guideline thresholds, and how to use it alongside HAS-BLED to counsel patients with atrial fibrillation.